“…Peta’s UK director Mimi Bekhechi that real fur is anything other than abhorrent. She maintains that the pro-lobby have got it wrong on the environmental impact of faux fur, and says there are plenty of eco-friendly faux options available.
She also claims that a cocktail of carcinogens, such as ammonia, chromium and formaldehyde, which is often used in dressing and dyeing real fur, negates its biodegradability.
‘Fur is only “natural” when it’s on the animal who was born with it,’ says Mimi.
‘Recent independent studies have found that the impact of production of a mink coat on climate change is three to ten times higher than the impact of a faux-fur coat.
‘We all have the choice to be cruel or kind. So, when real fur involves electrocuting a fox, or slitting the throat of a rabbit for fur trim, choosing one of the many soft, warm and luxurious faux or fur-free options, which are also more eco-friendly, becomes a no-brainer.’
Meanwhile, Minna Attala says: ‘If someone was to be truly to-the- letter ethical, they ought to forego both real and faux fur — and also fast fashion in general.’…”
VLA response:
We totally agree with the comments and findings of PETA. There is currently significant lobbying being done by the fur industry to counteract the exposes done on their horrific industry. Far from the picture they paint of good welfare the processes involved are horrendous. This is made more tragic by the fact that it’s totally unnecessary for humans (other than those in extreme subsistence situations) to wear fur.
Yes, there are problems with faux versions too and this is why caution over purchase is advised.
If vanity persuades you to buy fur – please Google how your item was made.
There are literally dozens of alternative (cruelty-free) ways to stay warm and to look great too.
veganlifestyleassoc.com/clothing